tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post4709786862762284045..comments2024-03-28T09:13:28.093+00:00Comments on Penny Red: Humourless feminazi *1: fuck the animals.Penny Redhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07677315565893516941noreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-15397270342893921492014-11-04T08:48:35.753+00:002014-11-04T08:48:35.753+00:00PETA fights for animal rights. I dont like what th...PETA fights for animal rights. I dont like what they do. So let me stab the first animal right in the neck, steal her babies, kill them too, skin them, eat their corpse, let the animals face eternal Treblinka in my hands. <br /><br />Yeah, very sane.பிரதீப் - கற்றது நிதியியல்!https://www.blogger.com/profile/14062984166979452736noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-21496981672252019082013-01-18T06:32:25.757+00:002013-01-18T06:32:25.757+00:00worthwhile only for the way they look and (for so ...worthwhile only for the way they look and (for so many pet owners) for how warm and fluffy they make us feel. Seeing Jodie Marsh's bottom is not shocking. <a href="http://www.can-c.biz/canine-cataracts-why.html" rel="nofollow">can-c</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00181753070857437581noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-5255409518512978432012-05-01T11:55:30.718+01:002012-05-01T11:55:30.718+01:00Animal testing is a different issue, but eating an...Animal testing is a different issue, but eating animals is unnecessary in our society. Regardless of why we used to do it, we could stop today. It harms animals, people in the developing world, and the environment, and we only do it for trivial pleasure. That is unjustifiable. Eat something else. Go Vegan.Astrojacqshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06493819822471289503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-459001978405095412009-08-22T02:57:20.286+01:002009-08-22T02:57:20.286+01:00Agreed on all your anti-objectification points...n...Agreed on all your anti-objectification points...not so much the kicking kittens points. Humans are sick and nothing is going to change that. BUT there SHOULD be a naked man being compared to a piece of meat, although even if that was part of the ad campaign i'm not sure it would be very effective-men will never understand exactly how it feels to be violated, threatened, abused, used, KILLED, and put down like women are regularly for no reason other than the fact that we have DIFFERENT ANATOMY. pathetic bastards. peta will stop at nothing to continue to push their radical ideals, even if it means appealing to the lowest of the low. i don't know how i'm not a lesbian. Also, I am absolutely certain i love animals more than most anyone i know or have heard of, and I didn't last longer than three months of vegetarianism. i suppose it's a nice idea, but as we all should know, eating meat is nothing to be reprimanded for!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-74996064321104732152009-06-15T04:14:28.669+01:002009-06-15T04:14:28.669+01:00"Ok...Ok...Am I going to have to?"Come o...<i>"Ok...Ok...Am I going to have to?"Come on good G, why type that when nobody can interject? It's a bit rich to castigate self-righteousness in bold OR CAPITALISED text, but then wheel out this sigh-punctuated spiel.</i><br /><br />It was me being irked. I just don't see why the entire feminist movement is so blind when it comes to so obvious a ruse.<br /><br /><br /><i>No, I'd say that their leering style - "Vegetarian vixen Jodie Marsh has been called "The Human Viagra"" - and Sun-a-like stunts - "Go vegetarian!” says stunning Jodie Marsh in a sexy letter of support to our boys" - is more to draw the attention of the soiled paper towel press.</i><br /><br />Dual-function, perhaps. Certainly they can't be oblivious to the massive amount of trackbacks from enraged, finger-wagging feminists outraged at their "objectification".Jameshttp://scriboergosum.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-61955451104646008032009-05-19T14:09:00.000+01:002009-05-19T14:09:00.000+01:00Sigh. You would think that, as a vegan (not a PET...Sigh. You would think that, as a vegan (not a PETA member) and feminist, I would be used to being patronised by smug animal-users.Vanilla Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07946634138308342764noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-71205840329987720022009-05-19T14:07:00.000+01:002009-05-19T14:07:00.000+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Vanilla Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07946634138308342764noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-37152216259525517722009-05-17T17:23:00.000+01:002009-05-17T17:23:00.000+01:00I'm a vegetarian and have been for a while. It...I'm a vegetarian and have been for a while. It's always pretty awkward when omnivores ask me why and I have to say 'for ethical reasons'. I find that it is more usually meat-eaters who are keen to argue about the ethics of their diet. I really don't give that much of a shit what their choice is and would rather they just shut up and eat. Of course, some vegetarians are sententious and smug, but I doubt there's many more or less than in any other group of people - socialists, anarchists, feminists, whatever.<br /><br />Julie Bindel's piece in the guardian is a lot of shit as well. Vegetarianism is a middle-class choice? Not really. Go to any developing country and it is the poor who don't eat as much (or any) meat. The consumption of meat by a growing middle-class in the developing world (as well as the more general consumption of it in the 'developed' world)and the increase in demand is a cause of rising food prices which affects the poor most severely. There's also the climate change issue to think about.<br /><br />Human rights > animal rights is probably true, but I don't think that being vegetarian or supporting Peta means you can't give a shit about people. Just the same as supporting a homeless charity in Britain means you can't give a shit about people in the rest of the world.<br /><br /><br />yeah.mwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15472783828486096296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-60150716048774370492009-05-16T17:49:00.000+01:002009-05-16T17:49:00.000+01:00"Ok...Ok...Am I going to have to?"Come on good G, ...<I>"Ok...Ok...Am I going to have to?"</I>Come on good G, why type that when nobody can interject? It's a bit rich to castigate self-righteousness in <B>bold</B> <B>OR CAPITALISED</B> text, but then wheel out this sigh-punctuated spiel.<br /><br /><I>"The reason they do this stupid shit is because all the stupid feminists make SIMPLY OUTRAGED posts about it, without realising your self-righteousness exacerbates, rather than alleviating, the problem."</I>Er, why would they roll out an entire advertising campaign to attract the specialist web demographic of a few (relatively) low-traffic blogs? Considering that their previous efforts have attracted <A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/4365671/Super-Bowl-ban-for-Peta-commercial-deemed-too-sexy.html" REL="nofollow">general</A>, <A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/deadlineusa/2009/jan/28/nbc-peta-super-bowl-ad" REL="nofollow">mainstream</A> <A HREF="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/01/29/peta-advert-too-sexy-for-tv-115875-21079334/" REL="nofollow">media</A> <A HREF="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/17/fox-news-anchor-megyn-kel_n_167656.html" REL="nofollow">coverage</A>, it'd be futile in the extreme. <br /><br />No, I'd say that their <A HREF="http://www.peta.org.uk/feat/jodiemarsh.asp" REL="nofollow">leering style</A> - "<I>Vegetarian vixen Jodie Marsh has been called "The Human Viagra"</I>" - and <A HREF="http://www.peta.org.uk/feat/feat-jodiemarsh_worldcup.asp" REL="nofollow"><EM>Sun</EM>-a-like stunts</A> - "<I>Go vegetarian!” says stunning Jodie Marsh in a sexy letter of support to our boys</I>" - is more to <A HREF="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/online/article293703.ece" REL="nofollow">draw</A> the <A HREF="http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/50816/Beauty-for-the-Beasts/" REL="nofollow">attention</A> <A HREF="http://showhype.com/story/kristen_johnston_bares_all_for_peta_s_anti_cruelty_ad/" REL="nofollow">of</A> the soiled paper towel press.BenSixhttp://backtowardsthelocus.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-6870104207331733092009-05-15T01:11:00.000+01:002009-05-15T01:11:00.000+01:00This PETA ad campaign fails on sooo many levels.So...<I>This PETA ad campaign fails on sooo many levels.</I>Sorry, Paula, but it succeeds on The Big One: getting a metric fuck-load of attention towards their (moronic, animal murdering) organisation. Because there are a dozen posts on big-name blogs, probably scores more on smaller ones, whining and whining and <I>whining</I> about how terrible/nutjobish/absurd/demeaning/reptilian PETA are.<br /><br />In short: <I>it works.</I> Courtesy of the Ms. Red's of the world.Jameshttp://scriboergosum.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-53187521215138571762009-05-15T01:01:00.000+01:002009-05-15T01:01:00.000+01:00Ok...Ok...Am I going to have to? Alright, yeah. I ...Ok...Ok...Am I going to <I>have</I> to? Alright, yeah. I think so.<br /><br />I've pointed this out > ten thousand times, but it still isn't getting through. I'll try again:<br /><br /><B>The reason they do this stupid shit is because all the stupid feminists make SIMPLY OUTRAGED posts about it, without realising your self-righteousness exacerbates, rather than alleviating, the problem. They won't go away if you keep on pointing at them, in fact you pointing is SORT of what the people organising the ADVERT campaign are hoping for.<br /><br />FFS.</B>Jameshttp://scriboergosum.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-37208167431835086912009-05-14T17:12:00.000+01:002009-05-14T17:12:00.000+01:00"If you read any of my stuff online (just google '..."If you read any of my stuff online (just google 'Penny Red' if you can be bothered) you'll see that I've got a sense of humour."<br /><br />Probably not the greatest argument, you do come across as a bit humourless.Winston Smithhttp://www.blackpeopleloveus.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-75064193821627313872009-05-14T15:40:00.000+01:002009-05-14T15:40:00.000+01:00@ David Floyd
Jodie may not have antlers but that...@ David Floyd<br /><br />Jodie may not have antlers but that slutty, curvaceous, foul mouthed, oversexed, working class bitch never fails but to give me the horn! And then some! <br /><br /><I>"Fuck the animals!"</I>Isn't that called bestiality, Penny? <br /><br />Or is it zoophilia? <br /><br />Whatever, it doesn't sound nice to me. Eat all the meat you want you stroppy little shrew and die of colon cancer at an early age!Hardonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-64917127087471777012009-05-14T13:28:00.000+01:002009-05-14T13:28:00.000+01:00Maybe the images are meant to shock precisely beca...Maybe the images are meant to shock precisely because they seem misogynistic and they seem to eroticise violence against women? PETA are pretty famous for aiming to shock.<br />I am a vegetarian, and I do think there is a problem with people being unable to equate the nice juicy pork chop they're about to tuck into with an intelligent thing that was killed so they could eat it. I do think this ad campaign is pretty misguided though.<br />I do agree with whoever said that PETA are misanthropic in general instead of misogynistic. They just seem to have their priorities all wrong. In my view human rights > animal rights, which is probably why I am a member of amnesty rather than PETA.Scoobynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-40581405131706437572009-05-14T11:58:00.000+01:002009-05-14T11:58:00.000+01:00Not sure about this from Julie Bindel: "But as an ...Not sure about this from Julie Bindel: "But as an animal lover who agrees in principle with most reasons for giving up meat, I would rather not join that band of humourless, judgmental souls."<br /><br />Surely the answer to that is don't eat meat and don't be humourless and judgmental? Probably best not to describe this as multitasking. <br /><br />Anyway, I join the chorus of vegetarians against exploitations of humans. Not least because it's rubbish. All animals don't have the same parts. Jodie doesn't have antlers.David Floydhttp://www.chartist.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-70076019544366900732009-05-14T10:57:00.000+01:002009-05-14T10:57:00.000+01:00Fucking PETA making me have this exact conversatio...Fucking PETA making me have this exact conversation so many times...<br /><br />PETA are not representative of animal rights in general, nor of animals. Since not even a single one of the billions of animals killed regularly by humans is a member of PETA, we shouldn't respond to their fucked up campaigns by rejecting the idea of animal rights. <br /><br />It's also concpicuously false that "We’ve always found it easier to be humane to creatures that can’t talk back, creatures that don’t pose any real social threat to us, creatures that aren’t likely to call us out on our failings or break our hearts." <br /><br />We have, in fact, quite clearly not found it easy, but rather exceedingly difficult, to be remotely humane to animals. Which is why we are so very not. <br /><br />Also, all of the animal rights philosophy or advocacy books I've read have focused on sentience, the capacity to rejoice or suffer, 'being the subject of a life', or something like that, not cuteness and fluffiness. It is in fact a distinctive feature of human abuse of animals that we attach great significance to whether something gives us 'warm and fluffy feelings'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-86398146205519242352009-05-14T07:51:00.000+01:002009-05-14T07:51:00.000+01:00It is a well known fact that psychopaths, e.g., Te...It is a well known fact that psychopaths, e.g., Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer, often began their murderous careers by being cruel toward, torturing and killing small animals. Disdain and unconcern in respect to the welfare of living things is, psychiatrically, often the sign of a non-empathic, underdeveloped and immature personality. When people start caring more about their television reception post digital switchover than they do about the welfare of endangered species like Polar Bears and Pandas, or even domestic animals like dog and cats, what does that say about us as a species?Zanoninoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-69908942603770077092009-05-14T06:30:00.000+01:002009-05-14T06:30:00.000+01:00This PETA ad campaign fails on sooo many levels. I...This PETA ad campaign fails on sooo many levels. Its treatment of women has been well documented by Penny. Its treatment of vegetarians is awful to. According to the ads all vegetarians are nubile young women of little brain who drop their clothes readily. <br /><br />Is this the image vegetarians really want?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-32215776906974248532009-05-14T02:02:00.000+01:002009-05-14T02:02:00.000+01:00Uh.... what about this one?
They are clearly sayin...Uh.... what about <A HREF="http://www.peta.org.uk/mc/page/600-kimora-lee-simmons-angel.jpg" REL="nofollow">this one</A>?<br />They are clearly saying here that women are angels and that men are devils - why are there no men in heaven. Though on second thoughts, maybe it`s some kind of veiled threat - "alla yus wamen`ll be an haven suun, `cause we`re ganna kill yu". Yes that`s probably it.<br /><br />Also, there are lots of pictures of naked men included in their campaign (including a rather worrying sketch of Julian Clarey) so... what are you going on about?<br /><br />Only the cynical or utterly dehumanised could view this campaign as an advocation of violence against women.Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-427638921888726232009-05-13T21:21:00.000+01:002009-05-13T21:21:00.000+01:00Julie Bindel's screed reminds me of one essent...Julie Bindel's screed reminds me of one essential truth.<br /><br />Self-righteous, sneering carnivores are far more common than self-righteous, sneering vegetarians. <br /><br />If she hadn't gone into that place with an attitude problem, she'd have seen nothing amiss with the staff's attitude, because there fucking WAS nothing amiss with their attitude. "Seemed to believe" my arse- also, about her class baiting, I'm a vegetarian & I think I earn a wee fucking bit less than her.<br /><br />Seriously- did she feel better after spewing that one forth?asquithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14246701347539264295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-69366371774803066072009-05-13T16:41:00.000+01:002009-05-13T16:41:00.000+01:00You commend people to kick helpless kittens in the...You commend people to kick helpless kittens in the face and yet, in the same breath, condemn men who enjoy kicking a pussy when warehoused between the legs of a girl or a woman! I find your blatant prejudice and shameless double standards in regard to sexual preferences quite startling in this day and age! In my opinion this is blatant sexism at its worst! Utterly nescient and disgraceful! If you can kick mewling and defenseless kittens to death why shouldn't I continue to kick my wife repeatedly in the cunt albeit non-lethally?<br /><br />It's all good fun and grist to the mill.<br /><br />Like Bombay Duck one man's meat is another man's poisson!Boot Boynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-4623368378929714682009-05-13T16:26:00.000+01:002009-05-13T16:26:00.000+01:00last time I looked, I owned my own ass!last time I looked, I owned my own ass!Penny Redhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07677315565893516941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-55057827809611378522009-05-13T16:23:00.000+01:002009-05-13T16:23:00.000+01:00Warren Ellis owns your ass Penny Red!Warren Ellis owns your ass Penny Red!Crazy Jane (from Yeats not the Doom Patrol)noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-28374045466390851492009-05-13T16:16:00.000+01:002009-05-13T16:16:00.000+01:00There is so much love in your heart, Ms. Red.
Why...There is so much love in your heart, Ms. Red.<br /><br />Why pretend otherwise?<br /><br />Silly girl!Boddhisatvanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4343658614010405479.post-89940007671374103152009-05-13T15:50:00.000+01:002009-05-13T15:50:00.000+01:00PS: You want a turf war? Savour the irony of this ...<I>PS: You want a turf war? Savour the irony of this well-known feminist giving vegetarians a kicking.</I>Christ, being called "humourless, judgemental" by JULIE BINDEL?????????Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com