****
Remember hard copy? Your kids might not. This week it emerged that newspaper sales are plummeting in Britain, with only 33% of the population now claiming to be regular readers of analogue news. As more and more of us cherry-pick our media online, drawing little distinction between the mainstream press and the popular blogosphere, industry insiders are beginning to panic, predicting the violent death of quality commentary and investigative journalism at the multiferous hands of the internet.
On several baffling occasions in recent months, I have found myself at snooty media events where hosts introduce me and my colleagues as gingerly as ‘bloggers’, rather as if we were the grinning emissaries of a rogue state, ambassadors from a territory of violent cultural change which the authorities might soon see fit to brutally suppress but which, for now, must be appeased with canapés and party invitations. Cosy members of the established commentariat eye bloggers suspiciously, as if beneath our funny clothes and unruly hair we might actually be strapped with information bombs ready to explode their cultural paradigms and destroy their livelihoods.
This sort of prejudice is deeply anodyne. Bloggers aren't out to take away the jobs of highly-paid columnists: we're more ambitious than that. We're out for a complete revolution in the way media and politics are done. Whilst the media establishment guards its borders with paranoid rigour, snobbishly distinguishing between 'bloggers' and 'journalists', people from the internet have already infiltrated the mainstream. Many influential writers now work across both camps, such as author, blogger and digital activist Cory Doctorow, who observed that the blogosphere need not threaten paid comment journalism:
“Commercially speaking, newspapers can make enough money from advertising to pay reasonable rates for opinion,” said Doctorow. “I know of at least one that does, and that's my site, BoingBoing, which reaches millions of readers every month. By operating efficiently, we can more than match the fees paid by the New York Times, for example, which always pays peanuts for op-eds because the glory of being published in the NYT is meant to be its own reward.
"After you take away the adverts, the personals, the filler and the pieces hacked together from press releases, the average paper contains about fifteen column inches of decent investigative journalism and commentary,” said Doctorow. “And the internet is more than capable of financing fifteen column inches a day.”
What the blogosphere threatens is not the survival of comment journalism itself: it threatens the monopoly of the media elite, holding the self-important fourth estate to a higher standard than bourgeois columnists and editors find comfortable. We are, in effect, a fifth estate, scrutinising the mainstream media and challenging its assumptions.
Last month, when Danny Dyer appeared to advise a reader of Zoo magazine to cut his girlfriend's face, the feminist arm of the fifth estate responded angrily, prompted a retraction and apology from Zoo and successfully organised a donation drive to raised more money for women’s refuge charities than the discredited Dyer’s violently misogynist film Pimp made in its first week of release. That’s the type of power that scares the wits out of the dinosaurs in analogue media.
Every day, the British blogosphere becomes less amateurish and more relevant. This weekend the popular forum Liberal Conspiracy will host Blog Nation, an event bringing together bloggers, journalists and politicians on the left to determine how the internet can build progressive campaigns to fight public sector cuts. “We have a strong community that can do activism and provide niche information that escapes mainstream newspapers,” said Liberal Conspiracy editor Sunny Hundal. “We want to use the net to get the left to think more about strategy and action - and get people to work together, better!”
Doctorow is right to suggest that we are living through what Marx and Engels might term a “permanent technological revolution”. This weekend, in an incisive essay in The Guardian, John Naughton observed that being a consumer of media and journalism during the radical transformation of today's communications environment is a little
"like being a resident of St Petersburg in 1917, in the months before Lenin and the Bolsheviks finally seized power. It's clear that momentous events are afoot; there are all kinds of conflicting rumours and theories, but nobody knows how things will pan out. Since we don't have the benefit of hindsight, we don't really know where it's taking us.”
One thing, however, is certain: journalism is changing forever. The notion of political commentary as a few-to-many exercise, produced by highly-paid elites and policed by big business, has been shattered beyond repair. The internet is a many-to-many medium, and those who write and comment here are not media insiders, nor are we the mob. We are something altogether new.
We are the fifth estate, and we are forging a path through the miasma of technological change towards more a honest, democratic model of commentary - alongside a lot of porn and some pictures of amusing cats. The media revolution is ongoing. Whatever comes next, the bloggers' battle-cry must be the permanent technological revolution.
Cory Doctorow's new novel about gaming and digital organisation, For The Win, is published by Harper Voyager. You can register here for this Saturday's Blog Nation
"Whatever comes next, the bloggers' battle-cry must be the permanent technological revolution"
ReplyDeleteIt looks as if the concept of getting the links right was the first thing up against the wall!
Here is an idea, instead of waffling about something that is frankly obvious, you try reporting something.
ReplyDeleteHow about something like the recent BA cabin crew strike. Most people seemed to think that the strike was over the removal of perks. Apparently the issue was more complicated than that. I tried looking at the union's website but it was utterly disorganised, incoherent and a bit of an eyesore. I had to dig around quite a bit to learn what the strike was actually about.
Your writing just doesn't seem to be very informative and really all it seems to communicate is your lust for left wing politics and feminism.
One very annoying aspect of the so-called "blogosphere" is that it seems to mostly be badly written opinion. All fart and no shit.
Technology is always changing. Every generation thinks that their time, especially their youth, is special. The only revolution that is happening are the spin of the car and bicycle wheels. My goat still is being milked.
ReplyDeleteAs far as I am concerned I think it will be fucking fantastic to see right-wing shithouses like the late Lord Beaverbrook, and Rupert Murdoch emasculated as far as directing public opinion through distorted and biased articles in their stable of newspapers goes.
ReplyDeleteViva la internet!
Oh you and me Laurie. ARGENTINA MARADONNA. OH LA LA. MESSI. YEA THIS REVOLUTION YEA THIS IS THE REVOLUTION. MAN.
ReplyDeleteLet's go to Argentina and take it to the limit BABES.
JULY THE FIRST OK WITH YOU LIPS ELEVEN?
LOVE MR. DIVINE.
A lust for feminism! You should get that on a T-shirt along with that other slogan you liked that was meant as an insult.
ReplyDeleteI liked your point about Danny Dyer best out of this piece. Nobody could call that paragraph anything other than informative.
"I'll be blogging about the budget tonight, once I can work out something more coherent to write than 'fuck', 800 times over."
ReplyDeleteThat might be considered to be a coherent statement on the budget, you know. This comment reminded me of Rimmer from Red Dwarf:
Rimmer: [discussing his last exam] Lister, last time I only failed by the narrowest of narrow margins.
Lister: You what? You went in there, wrote "I AM A FISH" four hundred times, did a funny little dance and fainted!
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Red_Dwarf#The_End